Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
U11(tt, M, N) → U12(tt, activate(M), activate(N))
U12(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(N, 0) → N
plus(N, s(M)) → U11(tt, M, N)
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
U11(tt, M, N) → U12(tt, activate(M), activate(N))
U12(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(N, 0) → N
plus(N, s(M)) → U11(tt, M, N)
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
U11(tt, M, N) → U12(tt, activate(M), activate(N))
U12(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(N, 0) → N
plus(N, s(M)) → U11(tt, M, N)
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:
plus(N, 0) → N
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(0) = 2
POL(U11(x1, x2, x3)) = x1 + x2 + x3
POL(U12(x1, x2, x3)) = 2·x1 + x2 + x3
POL(activate(x1)) = x1
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(s(x1)) = x1
POL(tt) = 0
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
U11(tt, M, N) → U12(tt, activate(M), activate(N))
U12(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(N, s(M)) → U11(tt, M, N)
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
U11(tt, M, N) → U12(tt, activate(M), activate(N))
U12(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(N, s(M)) → U11(tt, M, N)
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:
plus(N, s(M)) → U11(tt, M, N)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(U11(x1, x2, x3)) = x1 + 2·x2 + 2·x3
POL(U12(x1, x2, x3)) = x1 + 2·x2 + 2·x3
POL(activate(x1)) = x1
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = 2·x1 + 2·x2
POL(s(x1)) = 1 + x1
POL(tt) = 1
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
U11(tt, M, N) → U12(tt, activate(M), activate(N))
U12(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
U11(tt, M, N) → U12(tt, activate(M), activate(N))
U12(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:
U11(tt, M, N) → U12(tt, activate(M), activate(N))
U12(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(U11(x1, x2, x3)) = 2 + 2·x1 + 2·x2 + 2·x3
POL(U12(x1, x2, x3)) = 2 + x1 + 2·x2 + 2·x3
POL(activate(x1)) = x1
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(s(x1)) = 2·x1
POL(tt) = 1
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:
activate(X) → X
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(activate(x1)) = 1 + x1
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RisEmptyProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.